M.Zharkikh's personal site logo
Mail to site
Print version
News (RSS)
History / Monographs / Two traditions chronicles / "Vytautas" chronicle / Acts of Vytautas

Two traditions chronicles
Grand Duchy of Lithuania

"Vytautas" chronicle

Acts of Vytautas

Nicholas Zharkikh

Was "Tale of Vytautas" exist as a separate product, more precisely, as a separate manuscript notebook? In all copies, which kept the final phrase of the TOV ("land rejoice"), it is not separated from the following text, and only in the Novgorod Chronicle Dubrovsky (see below), we have a copy of its own.

In the vast majority of the copies after the TOV, we have a continuation of the story acts of Vytautas (AV) already recognized as the Grand Duke of Lithuania. I see no reason to doubt that the text was written by the author of the TOV as a continuation of the story.

Variants text "Vytautas" chronicle

Variants text "Lithuanian" chronicle

Analysis variants

Conclusions

1. The oldest and best text "Acts" can be obtained by combining text Vit1L and Vit3L. It should use in historical studies. In later copies these texts quickly and significantly deteriorate.

2. The preserved texts of "Acts" have only one edition, but it is possible to think that it is not original (it is possible to assume inclusion about death Skirgaila and one fragment transferred to the "Tale of Podillja land").

3. "Acts" should be evaluated highly in respect its source value. No traces of the use of written sources are visible, "Acts" were written almost simultaneously with the events, and almost certainly by the same author that wrote TOV (who certainly was not small in the year of death Skirgaila!). The level of competence of the author the same as with TOV, high enough. That is, these records can be considered as the primary source.

4. In the manuscript tradition AV constitute an indispensable addition to the TOV. Therefore, we can assume that it could be a separate manuscript consist of TOV + AV.

5. In ideological terms "Acts" follow in the direction specified by TOV: they glorify Vytautas as a diligent and successful ruler. Termination of "Acts" at the events of 1397, I guess a consequence of writers death, which replacement could not be found.

6. The place of writing a work should be considered as Vilna.

7. The previous researchers joined AV to the previous or the following text, so it was not determined the time of writing the work and did not properly marked its value.

Previous section | Table of content | Next section

Please this page? Help us to develop this site!

1978 2018 N.I.Zharkikh

Reprinting of articles from site are encouraged while
reference (hyperlink) to my site is provided

Site powered by

Load count : 194

Modified : 7.04.2017

If you look up the type error
on this page, please select it
by mouse and press Ctrl+Enter.