Republic of Crimea
N.I.Zharkikh
Neither Stepan Rudansky,
nor Ismael Gasprinsky…
There were in the list in 2001 – 40 places.
Excluded from the list – 12 places.
Added to the list – 9 sites.
Reported in the list in 2009 – 37 places.
Updating percentage = 52.5%
These sites collected 87 penalty points, giving an average of 2.35 points for a site.
Detailed item-by-item analysis available in ukrainian version.
Crimean list makes depressing experience. Have autonomy, to live better than the rest of the land – is a clear and good, but have the autonomy to live worse – it is something inconceivable, favorable for pigs only. Among the crimean heritage we don't see the most attractive sights and objects that have form the image of Crimea:
Fortress Funa (in the list) can not replace the Sudak fortress (not listed);
Theatre in Evpatoria can not substitute Bahchisaray Palace;
Syuren fortress can not replace Mangup;
Tomb of S.M. Sergeyev-Tsensky can not substitute for the unique ensemble of Old Crimea;
Mythical "ancient Rus settlemrnt of town Korchev" can not fully replace the real settlement Chufut-Calais;
Kerch fortress can not replace the Eski-Kermen.
Do Crimean swines preservation officials does not know about these objects? They know even better than we! But thoughts they do not guard these treasures, but something beastly.
Previous section | Table of content | Next section
|
